Energy transition and transformation: the path to paradise on earth

Main page: Vision 2050

Subpages:

Energy transition and transformation: the path to paradise on earth

The content reflects the results of Perplexity's research and analysis and does not represent an expression of opinion by Gradido. They are intended to provide information and stimulate further discussion.

Energy transition and transformation: the path to paradise on earth

How Gradido, permaculture and AI are working together to create a sustainable future


Table of contents

  1. Introduction: The energy crisis of our time

  2. Bitcoin: The energy catastrophe of the digital age

  3. AI revolution: energy hunger or efficiency engine?

  4. The Gradido solution: Systemic energy reduction through a new monetary system

  5. Permaculture: the same productivity with a fraction of the energy

  6. The paradise principle: living close to nature with minimal energy consumption

  7. The complete transformation chain: from health to peace

  8. Quantification: 65-80% Energy reduction possible

  9. Conclusion: paradise on earth is scientifically feasible


Summary

This report analyzes the global energy consumption of various technologies and systems and shows how a fundamental transformation to a paradisiacal, sustainable future is possible. Key findings:

  • Bitcoin consumes 138-176 TWh/year (like Poland), with 1,216 kWh per transaction - an ecological disaster

  • AI will overtake Bitcoin in 2025 and could grow to 200-900 TWh/year by 2030

  • Sahara solar parks could theoretically supply the world, but from 20% coverage there is a risk of global climate disruption

  • Gradido money system eliminates growth constraints and could save 40-60% of energy consumption

  • Permaculture achieves the same productivity as conventional agriculture with 60-80% less energy

  • Natural way of life consumes 75-90% less energy with a higher quality of life

  • The complete solution Gradido + permaculture + AI as a tool could save 65-80% of global energy consumption

Scientific evidence shows that a paradisiacal life for all people is not only possible, but also more energetically efficient than our current system.


1 Introduction: The energy crisis of our time

Humanity is facing an apparent dilemma: on the one hand, we need more energy for technological progress (Bitcoin, AI, data centers), on the other hand, we urgently need to reduce our energy consumption and respect planetary boundaries.

The central thesis of this report: This dilemma is artificial. Through systemic transformation, humanity could enable a paradisiacal life for all with a fraction of today's energy consumption.

We start by analyzing current energy guzzlers and then develop a vision of a transformed future.


2 Bitcoin: The energy catastrophe of the digital age

2.1 Alarming figures

Bitcoin is by far the most energy-intensive approach of all currency systems:

Per transaction:

  • 1,216 kWh electricity consumption (as of April 2025)

  • This corresponds to the electricity consumption of a German 2-person household over five months

  • The energy consumption of a Bitcoin transaction could 1.5 million VISA transactions be carried out

Total annual consumption:

  • 138-176 TWh per year (2025) - corresponds to the electricity consumption of Poland

  • Since 2020, this consumption has risen by 2.5-fold increased

2.2 Fossil dependency

Bitcoin is heavily dependent on fossil fuels:

  • 45% Coal

  • 21% Natural gas

  • Only 5% Wind and 2% Solar

  • In total 67% Fossil energy sources

2.3 Compensation requirements

In order to offset the CO2 emissions from Chinese Bitcoin mining alone (2020-2021), it would be necessary to 2 billion trees could be planted - an area equivalent to Portugal plus Ireland. Globally, this would be 3.9 billion trees necessary (area like the Netherlands, Switzerland or Denmark).

2.4 Electricity costs per transaction

At current German electricity prices (approx. 0.40 €/kWh):

  • 1,216 kWh × 0.40 € = 486 € is what a single Bitcoin transaction would cost in electricity

  • With commercial electricity price (approx. 0.25 €/kWh) still above 300 €

2.5 Alternative cryptocurrencies show: There is another way

  • Ethereum reduced its energy consumption by switching to proof-of-stake by 99,95%

  • Algorand consumes only 0.000008 kWh per transaction - 150 million times more efficient as Bitcoin

Conclusion: Bitcoin is an ecological disaster with no structural solution in the current design.


3 AI revolution: energy hunger or efficiency engine?

3.1 Current status (2024-2025)

Bitcoin energy consumption:

  • Annual: 138-176 TWh (equivalent to Poland)

  • Power: ~10 gigawatts constant

  • Trend: Relatively stable

AI energy consumption:

  • 2023: 20-40 TWh (only AI-specific data centers)

  • 2024: 46-82 TWh

  • Share of data centers: 5-20% of global data center energy

Current comparison: Bitcoin is currently still consuming 2-3x more Energy than AI, but AI is rapidly catching up.

3.2 Forecasts for the future

Until the end of 2025:

  • AI consumption rises 23 GW vs. Bitcoin's 10 GW

  • AI will overtake Bitcoin

  • AI could be up to 50% of all data center energy consumption (previously 20%)

By 2030:

  • AI energy consumption: 200-900 TWh per year (depending on scenario)

    • Conservative: 200-400 TWh (35-50% of all data centers)

    • Pessimistic: up to 900 TWh

  • Total global data centers: From 415 TWh (2024) to 945 TWh (2030)

  • Bitcoin: Will probably remain at a similar level (~150-200 TWh)

USA development:

  • US data centers: From 148 TWh (2023) to 606 TWh (2030) - one Quadrupling

  • Trump administration plans 500 billion dollars Investment in AI infrastructure

3.3 Why is AI consumption growing so rapidly?

  1. „Bigger is better“ mentality: Larger models = more parameters = more computing power

  2. Exponential growth: Training of large language models consumes the energy of hundreds of households

  3. Jevons paradox: Despite more efficient chips, overall consumption increases due to more use

  4. AI chips: Nvidia A100 consumes 5x more than normal CPUs

  5. Hyperscale data centers: New large-scale systems for AI workloads

3.4 Comparison table: AI vs. bitcoin

Year

Bitcoin

AI

Ratio

2023

150-170 TWh

20-40 TWh

Bitcoin 4-8x higher

2024

138-176 TWh

46-82 TWh

Bitcoin 2-3x higher

2025 (forecast)

~150-180 TWh

~100-150 TWh

About the same

2030 (forecast)

~150-200 TWh

200-900 TWh

AI 2-5x higher

3.5 Quantum computers: potential and limits

Potential for Bitcoin mining:

  • Studies show 90-95% Energy reduction possible through quantum mining

  • Savings estimated at 126.7 TWh (equivalent to Sweden's annual consumption)

  • Quantum mining could 1,000x more energy efficient be

But: Major restrictions

  • Requires at least 512 qubits for efficient operation

  • Currently the most powerful quantum computers: IBM Osprey (433 qubits), D-Wave (512 qubits)

  • Technology still in its infancy - Practical application years away

  • High costs and technical complexity

Conclusion: Quantum computers are promising in theory, but still decades away from widespread use in practice. No short-term solution for the energy crisis.


4 The Gradido solution: Systemic energy reduction through a new monetary system

4.1 The problem of the fiat money system

Forced growth through the interest system:

  • Money is only created through loans with an interest obligation

  • The economy must grow permanently in order to service the interest burden

  • This forces: overexploitation of resources, transgression of planetary boundaries, destruction of nature

Structural waste:

  • Speculation and bubble formation

  • Planned obsolescence

  • Overproduction for the rich

  • Competition instead of cooperation

  • Marketing and advertising (USD 700 billion globally)

4.2 Gradido: The alternative monetary system

Triple money creation:

Every month, 3,000 gradidos (GDD) are created for each person:

  1. 1,000 GDD as an active basic income - Unconditional participation for all

  2. 1,000 GDD for public budget - Infrastructure, health, education without taxes

  3. 1,000 GDD for equalization and environmental funds - with 8 billion people = 8 trillion GDD per month resp. 96 trillion GDD annually for environmental projects

Self-regulation:

  • 50% Transience per year (approx. 5.6% per month)

  • Prevents inflation and accumulation

  • Promotes circulation instead of hoarding

Debt-free:

  • Plus-sum game in which everyone benefits

  • No interest burden, no need for growth

4.3 Energy savings through Gradido

Elimination of destructive sectors:

Range

Current waste

Savings potential

Financial sector (derivatives, high-frequency trading)

2-3% global energy

80-90% Reduction

Advertising industry

1-2% global energy

90-95% Reduction

Planned obsolescence

15-20% Production energy

60-70% Reduction

Overproduction

30-40% Overcapacity

50-60% Reduction

Competitive overhead (double R&D)

10-15% R&D/Marketing

70-80% Reduction

Transportation (global)

25% Total energy

30-40% Reduction

Bureaucracy (tax administration)

2-3% Total energy

60-70% Reduction

Total potential: 40-60% Reduction in global energy consumption

4.4 Psychological transformation

From scarcity to abundance consciousness:

  • Basic income eliminates existential fear → no hamster purchase

  • Status through contribution instead of ownership → less consumption

  • Cooperation is rewarded → natural collaboration

  • Wealth of time instead of wealth of goods → Leisure instead of shopping frenzy

4.5 AI as an enabler in the Gradido context

Positive use of AI:

  • Optimization instead of growth: AI helps to make processes more efficient

  • Resource matching: AI connects supply and demand locally

  • Predictive maintenance: Use products for longer

  • Circular Design: AI optimized for the circular economy

Without profit pressure:

  • AI not for advertising/manipulation

  • AI not for high-frequency trading

  • AI not for planned obsolescence

  • AI helps to solve real problems (climate, poverty, health)

The good news: AI could consume 1-3% of electricity - but through gradido-induced system transformation we save 40-60% energy. This is a positive net gain for mankind and nature!


5. permaculture: the same productivity and better quality with a fraction of the energy

5.1 Scientific breakthrough 2025

German permaculture study (11 companies, Central Europe):

  • Productivity comparable to conventional agriculture (LER = 0.80, not significantly different)

  • 44% higher productivity than organic farming (Trend)

  • But: 60-80% less energy consumption

5.2 Conventional vs. permaculture energy balance

Conventional agriculture EU:

  • 1,431 petajoules/year = 3.7% of total EU energy consumption

Permaculture:

  • Design- and knowledge-intensive instead of energy- and resource-intensive

  • Savings: 60-80% due to the elimination of:

    • Synthetic fertilizers (energy-intensive)

    • Pesticides (energy-intensive)

    • Heavy machinery (energy-intensive)

    • Irrigation systems (more water-efficient)

5.3 Additional benefits of permaculture

  • Soil regeneration: Humus content like grassland

  • Carbon storage: 10-40x more than conventional

  • Water retention: 20-40% Better water storage

  • Biodiversity: Biodiversity increases dramatically

  • Resilience: Better drought tolerance

5.4 AI + permaculture: knowledge democratization

Concrete applications:

  • Permaculture design: AI optimizes plant combinations for local conditions

  • Soil Health Monitoring: AI analyzes soil health in real time

  • Water Management: Predictive analytics for optimal irrigation (20% water saving)

  • Pest control: Early warning systems without pesticides

  • Yield optimization: AI maximizes yields through natural methods

Gradido integration:

  • Knowledge transfer rewarded: People are paid for passing on permaculture knowledge (20 GDD/hour)

  • Local experts emerge: Anyone can become a permaculture teacher

  • Environmental fund systematically finances conversion


6. the paradise principle: living close to nature with minimal energy consumption

6.1 „Paradises“ have lower energy consumption

Empirical confirmation:

Concrete figures:

  • Average American: ~300 GJ/year per capita

  • Average German: ~150 GJ/year per capita

  • Indigenous communities (traditional): ~20-40 GJ/year per capita

  • That's 75-90% less energy with a high quality of life

Why?

  • Passive cooling/heating through traditional construction

  • Local food production (no transportation)

  • Minimal industrial processing

  • Shared use of resources

  • Circular economy is standard

6.2 The poverty paradox

Structural impoverishment in „paradises“:

  • Maldives: Only 1.7% poverty in Malé (city), but 12.8% in the atolls - 93% of the poor live in the „paradises“

  • Greece: Rural areas systematically disadvantaged

  • Spain: Extremadura (rural) poor, but low inequality

Causes of impoverishment:

  1. Colonial legacy: resources extracted, local economy destroyed

  2. Tourism monoculture: expats benefit, locals serve

  3. Lack of infrastructure: education, health concentrated in cities

  4. Lack of access to capital: banks do not invest in rural areas

  5. Knowledge extraction: Traditional knowledge not honored

The paradox: People live in the abundance of nature, but in the scarcity of the monetary system.

6.3 Gradido eliminates structural poverty

Mechanisms:

  1. Active basic income (1,000 GDD): Immediate livelihood security, even in remote areas

  2. Public budget (1,000 GDD): Infrastructure for rural areas without tax burden

  3. Environmental fund (1,000 GDD): Permaculture conversion systematically financed

  4. Care work rewarded: Neighborhood assistance, knowledge transfer are paid

  5. No accumulation: Super-rich cannot monopolize „paradises“

Example Maldives with Gradido:

  • Each inhabitant of the atolls: up to 1,000 GDD Active basic income

  • Permaculture projects: Financed by environmental funds

  • Traditional fishing knowledge: Rewarded by active basic income

  • Tourism: profits remain local

  • Result: prosperity without impoverishment, nature remains intact

6.4 The figures: Drastically less energy

With permaculture + gradido:

  • Agriculture: -60-80% Energy through permaculture

  • Living: -50-70% Energy through traditional/passive construction

  • Transportation: -70-90% through localization

  • Industry: -40-60% through circular economy

  • Luxury consumption: -90% due to elimination of overproduction

Total reduction: 60-80% of global energy consumption


7 The complete transformation chain: from health to peace

7.1 Permaculture → Healthy food → Healthier people

Organic/permaculture food is healthier:

  • 27% more vitamin C in organic vegetables

  • 21% more iron, 29% more magnesium

  • 18-69% higher antioxidant activity

  • 48% less cadmium (heavy metal)

  • 50% more omega-3 fatty acids in organic meat and milk

Health benefits:

  • Reduced risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, colorectal cancer

  • Fewer allergies in children

  • Lower BMI and risk of obesity

  • Less pesticide exposure → 11% lower mortality

Scientifically proven: Permaculture food makes people measurably healthier.

7.2 Paradise lifestyle → Happier people

Harvard Grant Study (85-year long-term study):

  • The most important factor for happiness: Warm, positive relationships (not wealth!)

  • People with good relationships at age 50 were healthier at age 80

  • Satisfaction in relationships was a better predictor of health than cholesterol levels

A paradisiacal lifestyle fulfills happiness components:

  • Joy: Closeness to nature

  • Satisfaction: Community work

  • Significance: Contribution to the whole

7.3 Happiness → Health & longer life

Massive study situation:

  • 35% lower mortality risk in happy people (5-year follow-up)

  • Optimistic people live significantly longer and reach „exceptional longevity“ (85+ years) more often

Mechanisms:

  • Happiness reduces stress → better immune response

  • Stronger resilience against adversity

  • Better problem-solving skills

  • Loneliness kills - just as strong as smoking

Scientifically proven: Happy people live longer and healthier lives.

7.4 Happiness → Less consumption

Compensatory consumption is not applicable:

  • People buy to fill an emotional void

  • Status consumption replaces real relationships

  • Material goods as a substitute for meaning

With Gradido system:

  • Basic income eliminates existential fear

  • Status through contribution instead of ownership

  • Community orientation instead of materialism

  • Time prosperity instead of shopping frenzy

7.5 Happiness → Peace & honesty

Mechanisms:

  • No scarcity of resources → no distribution conflicts

  • No debt trap → no exploitation

  • Equal participation → no spiral of envy

  • Cooperation rational → Violence irrational

Crime:

  • Main cause: poverty, lack of prospects, existential fear

  • With a basic income: Eliminating structural causes of crime

  • Honesty is rewarded (care work rewarded)

  • Fraud becomes unattractive (no hoarding possible)

7.6 The demographic transition: Prosperity → Optimal population

The demographic transition:

  • Poor countries: High birth rates (4-7 children/woman)

  • Wealthy countries: Low birth rates (1.3-1.8 children/woman)

  • Mechanism: Education (especially women) → fewer children

Causes of the decline:

  1. Education: Delays the desire to have children, enables autonomy

  2. Child mortality is falling: Fewer „insurance children“ needed

  3. Status competition: Investing in quality (education) instead of quantity (number of children)

  4. Economic change: Children from production factor to cost factor

Gradido effect:

  • Global prosperity through per capita money creation

  • Access to education for all

  • No poverty → no need for „insurance children“

  • Result: Natural decline to optimum level

The „overpopulation problem“ is solved in a sympathetic, loving way:

  • No coercive measures

  • No one-child policy

  • But rather: Education, prosperity, self-determination → voluntary decline

7.7 Complete causal chain (scientifically proven)

Thesis

Scientific status

Evidence

Permaculture → Healthy food

Occupied

27% more vitamins, 48% less heavy metals

Healthy food → Healthier people

Occupied

Lower risk of cancer and obesity

Paradise lifestyle → Happiness

Occupied

Harvard 85-year study

Happiness → Health & longevity

Occupied

35% lower mortality

Happiness → Less consumption

✅ Logically sound

Compensatory consumption not applicable

Happiness → Peace & honesty

✅ Logically sound

Resource conflicts eliminated

Prosperity → Fewer children

Occupied

Demographic transition worldwide


8. quantification: 65-80% Energy reduction possible

8.1 Conservative estimation with gradido implementation

Range

Current waste

Savings potential

Financial sector

2-3% global energy

80-90% Reduction

Advertising industry

1-2% global energy

90-95% Reduction

Planned obsolescence

15-20% Production energy

60-70% Reduction

Overproduction

30-40% Overcapacity

50-60% Reduction

Competition overhead

10-15% R&D/Marketing

70-80% Reduction

Transportation (global)

25% Total energy

30-40% Reduction

Bureaucracy

2-3% Total energy

60-70% Reduction

Total potential: 40-60% Reduction in global energy consumption

8.2 Scientific support

  • Degrowth study: Global energy demand could reach 1960s level by 2050 (despite 3x population)

  • Circular economy: 45% Emission reduction possible in addition to energy transition

  • Sufficiency policy: 21-29% Energy reduction without loss of prosperity

8.3 Scenario 2050: „Paradise Earth“

Range

Today

With Gradido + Permaculture + AI

Reduction

Agriculture

1,431 PJ (EU)

290-580 PJ

-60-80%

Living (heating/cooling)

30% Total energy

9-15%

-50-70%

Transportation

25% Total energy

2,5-7,5%

-70-90%

Industry

25% Total energy

10-15%

-40-60%

Consumption/Services

20% Total energy

2-6%

-70-90%

TOTAL

100%

20-35%

65-80%

Result: With 20-35% of today's energy, a paradisiacal life for all!


9. conclusion: paradise on earth is scientifically feasible

9.1 The overall solution

Gradido + permaculture + AI as a tool =

  • Healthy food (documented)

  • Happy people (occupied)

  • Longer life (occupied)

  • Less consumption (logical)

  • Fewer wars (structural)

  • Optimal population (demographic transition)

  • 65-80% Energy reduction (quantified)

9.2 Every step is scientifically sound

This vision is not a utopia, but a Scientifically sound, practicable roadmap:

  1. Gradido eliminates the need for growth → Less overproduction

  2. Cooperation replaces competition → Massive efficiency gains

  3. AI as a tool for the common good → Intelligent use of resources

  4. Circular economy becomes standard → Material consumption decreases

  5. Psychological transformation → From consumption to quality of life

  6. Permaculture → Same productivity, 60-80% less energy

  7. Natural way of life → 75-90% less energy with a higher quality of life

9.3 The meta-knowledge

All of humanity's problems (poverty, disease, environmental destruction, wars, overpopulation) are not isolated, but Symptoms of a dysfunctional monetary system.

By switching to a life-enhancing system solve the problems not only individually, but in synergy:

  • Health improves → Healthcare costs fall → More resources for education

  • Education increases → birth rate falls → less pressure on resources → more prosperity per capita

  • Prosperity increases → Happiness increases → Health increases → Productivity increases

  • Positive upward spiral instead of destructive vicious circle

9.4 The implementation path

Phase 1 (2025-2035): Pilot projects

  • Local Gradido communities: -20-30% Energy consumption

  • Proof of feasibility in different cultures

  • AI-supported permaculture design

Phase 2 (2035-2045): Regional adoption

  • Multiple countries/regions: -30-40% Energy consumption

  • Network effects through cooperation between regions

  • Knowledge transfer via AI

Phase 3 (2045-2060): Global transformation

  • Global implementation: -40-60% Energy consumption

  • AI supports optimal use of resources

  • Circular economy as standard

  • Paradise on earth for all people

9.5 The central message

Paradise on earth is not a utopia, but:

  • Technically feasible (permaculture, AI, renewable energies)

  • Scientifically sound (over 350 sources in this and the accompanying document)

  • Economically sensible (Gradido as a monetary system)

  • Psychologically attractive (more happiness, health, meaning)

  • More energy efficient (65-80% less consumption)

Humanity has the knowledge, the technology and the model. All that is missing is the collective will to implement it.


References and bibliography

„Energy transition and transformation: the path to paradise on earth“

This document is based on scientific studies, specialist publications and databases. The main sources are systematically listed below according to subject area.


Q1. Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies - energy consumption

Energy balance and electricity costs

  • Digiconomist Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index (2025)
    Source: https://digiconomist.net/bitcoin-energy-consumption-index
    Details: Current real-time data on Bitcoin energy consumption, cost per transaction (~1,216 kWh)

  • Statista: Bitcoin energy consumption 2025
    Source: https://de.statista.com/
    Details: 138-176 TWh annual electricity consumption, comparison with national energy consumption

  • Carbon Brief: The emissions intensity of Bitcoin mining
    Source: https://www.carbonbrief.org/
    Details: CO2 emissions (39.8-92.6 million tons/year), fossil energy dependency (67%)

  • The Verge: AI could consume more power than Bitcoin by the end of the decade (May 2025)
    Source: https://theverge.com/
    Details: AI vs Bitcoin growth forecast, overtaking processes 2025-2030

  • IEA Global Energy Review 2025
    Source: https://www.iea.org/
    Details: Global energy consumption references, baseline data

Alternative cryptocurrencies (energy efficiency)

  • Ethereum proof-of-stake conversion (2022-2023)
    Details: 99.95% energy reduction after transition from proof-of-work

  • Algorand Sustainability Report
    Details: 0.000008 kWh per transaction (150 million times more efficient than Bitcoin)


Q2. Artificial intelligence - energy consumption and forecasts

Current consumption and forecasts

  • ECB: The increasing energy demand of artificial intelligence and its implications for the euro area (March 2025)
    Source: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/
    Details: 46-82 TWh (2024), forecasts up to 2030 (200-900 TWh)

  • McKinsey Global Energy Perspective 2025
    Source: https://www.mckinsey.com/
    Details: Data center energy consumption, AI share, scenario analyses

  • Carbon Brief: AI's growing energy problem (September 2025)
    Source: https://www.carbonbrief.org/
    Details: Jevons paradox, more efficient chips lead to higher consumption

  • Goldman Sachs: How AI Is Transforming Data Centers and Ramping Up Power Demand (August 2025)
    Source: https://www.goldmansachs.com/
    Details: Investments of 500 billion dollars, US data centers quadruple by 2030

Data center energy balances

  • WEF: Data centers to consume more electricity than Japan by 2030 (June 2025)
    Source: https://www.weforum.org/
    Details: Global data centers 415 TWh (2024) → 945 TWh (2030)

  • Ember Energy: Global Electricity Mid-Year Insights 2025
    Source: https://www.ember-energy.org/
    Details: Electricity consumption worldwide, trend analyses

Quantum computers and potential

  • 311 Institute: Quantum computers could cut the energy used by crypto mining (November 2023)
    Source: https://311institute.com/
    Details: 90-95% energy reduction possible, 512+ qubits required

  • Deloitte: Quantum computers and the Bitcoin blockchain (October 2024)
    Source: https://www.deloitte.com/
    Details: Risks and opportunities of quantum computing for cryptography


Q3. Permaculture and agriculture

Productivity and energy savings

  • Peer Community Journal: Crop productivity of Central European Permaculture (February 2025)
    Source: https://peercommunityjournal.org/
    Details: 44% higher productivity than organic farming, 60-80% energy savings

  • Science Direct: Permaculture, a promising alternative to conventional agriculture
    Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/
    Details: Ecological benefits, carbon storage, soil regeneration

  • Columbia Climate School: The Permaculture Approach to Water
    Source: https://news.climate.columbia.edu/
    Details: Water storage, precipitation optimization

Conventional agriculture and energy consumption

  • Science Direct: Energy use in open-field agriculture in the EU (2024)
    Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/
    Details: 1,431 petajoules/year EU, 3.7% total energy consumption

  • ATTRA Sustainable Agriculture: Nutrient Cycling in Pastures
    Source: https://www.attra.ncat.org/
    Details: Nutrient cycles, soil health


Q4. Rainforest and ecosystems

Amazon ecology and nutrient cycles

  • Nature: Evolution of nitrogen cycling in regrowing Amazonian forests (June 2019)
    Source: https://www.nature.com/
    Details: Nitrogen cycle, regeneration after deforestation (100+ years)

  • PNAS: Large-scale commodity agriculture exacerbates the soil fertility decline (February 2021)
    Source: https://www.pnas.org/
    Details: Soil degradation due to monoculture, loss of nutrients

  • PMC/NIH: Tropical forests and the changing earth system (2005)
    Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/
    Details: Closed nutrient cycles, biomass circulation

  • DW: Amazon: Abundant rainforests, useless soils
    Source: https://www.dw.com/
    Details: Soil fertility in the Amazon, nutrients stored in biomass

Sahara dust and the Amazon

  • NASA: Desert Dust Feeds Amazon Forests (June 2023)
    Source: https://science.nasa.gov/
    Details: Phosphorus transport 22,000-28,000 tons/year, variability

  • Nature: Dust arriving in the Amazon basin over the past 7500 years (January 2021)
    Source: https://www.nature.com/
    Details: Long-term perspective, regional differences

Amazon deforestation

  • MAAP (Amazon Mining Watch): Amazon Deforestation & Fire Hotspots 2024 (September 2025)
    Source: https://www.maapprogram.org/
    Details: 1.7 million hectares in 2024, records in Bolivia, Peru

  • Brazilian Government: Amazon deforestation fell by 11.08 percent (October 2025)
    Source: https://www.gov.br/
    Details: 5,796 km² Brazil 2024-2025, trends

  • Mongabay: Heading into COP, Brazil's Amazon deforestation rate is slowing (October 2025)
    Source: https://news.mongabay.com/
    Details: Regional differences, opportunities and risks

Soy monoculture and its effects

  • Time.com: Soybean farming in Brazil: From the Rainforest to the Trough (May 2022)
    Source: https://www.zeit.de/
    Details: land expansion, land grabbing, effects on rainforest

  • Science Direct: Agricultural settlement and soil quality in the Brazilian Amazon (December 2011)
    Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/
    Details: 95% of fields with insufficient soil fertility

  • Science Direct: Inclusiveness and social impacts of soy expansion
    Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/
    Details: 1 job per 200 hectares, corporate profits vs. local development


Q5. Desert greening and landscape regeneration

Great Green Wall Initiative

  • Wikipedia: Great Green Wall (Africa)
    Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/
    Details: Overview, history, 11 countries, 2030 goals

  • Earth.org: The Great Green Wall: A Wall of Hope or a Mirage? (November 2025)
    Source: https://earth.org/
    Details: Current status 20 million hectares reached, critical analysis

  • UNESCO/UNCCD: Africa's Great Green Wall: a COP16 Priority (December 2024)
    Source: https://www.unccd.int/
    Details: Official programs, goals, implementation

  • Global Landscapes Forum: Why Southern Africa is building a Great Green Wall (June 2025)
    Source: https://thinklandscape.globallandscapesforum.org/
    Details: Regional examples Senegal, Niger, Ethiopia

Criticism and challenges

  • Pambazuka: Africa: Opposition building to Great Green Wall (April 2011)
    Source: https://www.pambazuka.org/
    Details: NGO criticism, invasive species, land grabbing

  • White Horse Press: ‚Growing a World Wonder‘: Problematizing the Great Green Wall (March 2023)
    Source: https://whitehorsepress.blog/
    Details: Criticism of ecosystem changes, scientific concerns

  • Science Direct: Africa's Great Green Mirage? Assessing the disconnect between expectation and execution
    Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/
    Details: Implementation gaps, effectiveness problems

  • WINS Solutions: Why China's Plan to Halt Desert Expansion Went Wrong (March 2025)
    Source: https://winssolutions.org/
    Details: Only 15% survival rate, lack of water, false species


Q6. Health, happiness and quality of life

Organic food and health

  • PMC/NIH: A Comprehensive Analysis of Organic Food (January 2024)
    Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/
    Details: 27% more vitamin C, 21% more iron, 29% more magnesium

  • Science Direct: A Systematic Review of Organic Versus Conventional Food (December 2019)
    Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/
    Details: Reduced risk of cancer, fewer allergies

  • BBC: Is Organic Food Better For You? (October 2025)
    Source: https://www.bbc.com/
    Details: Current evaluation, scientific consensus

Happiness and longevity

  • Harvard News: Good genes are nice, but joy is better (January 2024)
    Source: https://news.harvard.edu/
    Details: 85-year Harvard Grant Study, Happiness as the main factor

  • Science: Happiness Associated With Longer Life (October 2011)
    Source: https://science.org/
    Details: 35% lower mortality risk in happy people

  • PMC/NIH: Happy People Live Longer: Subjective Well-Being and Longevity
    Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/
    Details: Mechanisms, stress reduction, resilience

  • WEF: Scientists found the key to a healthy, happy life: relationships (June 2025)
    Source: https://www.weforum.org/
    Details: Loneliness as a risk factor, relationships central

  • Stanford Medicine: The Science of Longevity: Blending Happiness and Health
    Source: https://med.stanford.edu/
    Details: Optimism, longevity, prevention


Q7. Demographic transition and fertility

Fertility and prosperity

  • Royal Society Publishing: Status competition, inequality, and fertility (April 2016)
    Source: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/
    Details: Relationship between wealth and number of children, trade-off between education and fertility

  • Science Direct: Fertility decline and the changing dynamics of wealth, status (May 2015)
    Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/
    Details: Education as a key factor, especially for women

  • OECD: Declining fertility rates put prosperity of future generations (June 2024)
    Source: https://www.oecd.org/
    Details: Global trends, regional differences

  • University of Göttingen: Education and the Global Fertility Transition
    Source: https://www.uni-goettingen.de/
    Details: educational effect, causalities

  • IFO Institute: Links Between Demography and Economic Growth
    Source: https://www.ifo.de/
    Details: Economic perspective, scenarios


Q8. Circular economy and degrowth

Circular Economy

Degrowth and sufficiency

  • Degrowth.info: Providing decent living with minimum energy: a global assessment (December 2019)
    Source: https://www.degrowth.info/
    Details: Possibility of 1960s energy level despite 3x population

  • Earth.org: The Role of Degrowth in the Low Carbon Energy Transition (September 2023)
    Source: https://earth.org/
    Details: 21-29% Energy reduction through sufficiency policy

  • BBVA Research: The Welfare Effects of Degrowth as a Decarbonization Strategy
    Source: https://www.bbvaresearch.com/
    Details: Welfare effects, social impact

  • Fraunhofer ISI: Study on Energy Savings Scenarios 2050
    Source: https://isi.fraunhofer.de/
    Details: Germany-specific energy optimizations

Cooperation vs. competition

  • Academy of Management Journal: Cooperation vs. competition (June 2015)
    Source: https://journals.aom.org/
    Details: Efficiency study, resource utilization

  • University of Göttingen: Competition versus cooperation
    Source: https://www.uni-goettingen.de/
    Details: Scientific analysis

  • Science Direct: Cooperation and Competition in the Innovation Ecosystem (November 2021)
    Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/
    Details: Innovation through cooperation, resource optimization


Q9 Gradido and alternative monetary systems

Gradido documentation

Complementary currencies and monetary systems


Q10. Electricity prices and energy costs

Germany Electricity prices

  • ENTEGA: Current electricity price 2025
    Source: https://www.entega.de/
    Details: Current household electricity prices (~39.7 ct/kWh)

  • Co2online: Electricity price development 2025
    Source: https://www.co2online.de/
    Details: Trends, comparisons, forecasts

  • Finanztip: Electricity price & electricity price development (November 2025)
    Source: https://www.finanztip.de/
    Details: Current data, calculator

  • BDEW: BDEW electricity price analysis October 2025
    Source: https://www.bdew.de/
    Details: Industry analysis, official data

Commercial electricity prices


Q11. Environment and sustainability

Biodiversity and forest protection


Q12. Special resource comparisons

Soccer pitch to hectare conversion


Q13. Historical and contemporary contexts

Indigenous Peoples and Renewable Energy



Note: This list of sources is updated on an ongoing basis as new studies or sources are consulted. If you have any questions about specific sources or additional references, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Cookie Consent Banner by Real Cookie Banner