Energy transition and transformation: the path to paradise on earth
Homepage " Prosperity " Vision 2050 " Energy transition and transformation
The content reflects the results of Perplexity's research and analysis and does not represent an expression of opinion by Gradido. They are intended to provide information and stimulate further discussion.
Energy transition and transformation: the path to paradise on earth
How Gradido, permaculture and AI are working together to create a sustainable future
Table of contents
Introduction: The energy crisis of our time
Bitcoin: The energy catastrophe of the digital age
AI revolution: energy hunger or efficiency engine?
The Gradido solution: Systemic energy reduction through a new monetary system
Permaculture: the same productivity with a fraction of the energy
The paradise principle: living close to nature with minimal energy consumption
The complete transformation chain: from health to peace
Quantification: 65-80% Energy reduction possible
Conclusion: paradise on earth is scientifically feasible
Summary
This report analyzes the global energy consumption of various technologies and systems and shows how a fundamental transformation to a paradisiacal, sustainable future is possible. Key findings:
Bitcoin consumes 138-176 TWh/year (like Poland), with 1,216 kWh per transaction - an ecological disaster
AI will overtake Bitcoin in 2025 and could grow to 200-900 TWh/year by 2030
Sahara solar parks could theoretically supply the world, but from 20% coverage there is a risk of global climate disruption
Gradido money system eliminates growth constraints and could save 40-60% of energy consumption
Permaculture achieves the same productivity as conventional agriculture with 60-80% less energy
Natural way of life consumes 75-90% less energy with a higher quality of life
The complete solution Gradido + permaculture + AI as a tool could save 65-80% of global energy consumption
Scientific evidence shows that a paradisiacal life for all people is not only possible, but also more energetically efficient than our current system.
1 Introduction: The energy crisis of our time
Humanity is facing an apparent dilemma: on the one hand, we need more energy for technological progress (Bitcoin, AI, data centers), on the other hand, we urgently need to reduce our energy consumption and respect planetary boundaries.
The central thesis of this report: This dilemma is artificial. Through systemic transformation, humanity could enable a paradisiacal life for all with a fraction of today's energy consumption.
We start by analyzing current energy guzzlers and then develop a vision of a transformed future.
2 Bitcoin: The energy catastrophe of the digital age
2.1 Alarming figures
Bitcoin is by far the most energy-intensive approach of all currency systems:
Per transaction:
1,216 kWh electricity consumption (as of April 2025)
This corresponds to the electricity consumption of a German 2-person household over five months
The energy consumption of a Bitcoin transaction could 1.5 million VISA transactions be carried out
Total annual consumption:
138-176 TWh per year (2025) - corresponds to the electricity consumption of Poland
Since 2020, this consumption has risen by 2.5-fold increased
2.2 Fossil dependency
Bitcoin is heavily dependent on fossil fuels:
45% Coal
21% Natural gas
Only 5% Wind and 2% Solar
In total 67% Fossil energy sources
2.3 Compensation requirements
In order to offset the CO2 emissions from Chinese Bitcoin mining alone (2020-2021), it would be necessary to 2 billion trees could be planted - an area equivalent to Portugal plus Ireland. Globally, this would be 3.9 billion trees necessary (area like the Netherlands, Switzerland or Denmark).
2.4 Electricity costs per transaction
At current German electricity prices (approx. 0.40 €/kWh):
1,216 kWh × 0.40 € = 486 € is what a single Bitcoin transaction would cost in electricity
With commercial electricity price (approx. 0.25 €/kWh) still above 300 €
2.5 Alternative cryptocurrencies show: There is another way
Ethereum reduced its energy consumption by switching to proof-of-stake by 99,95%
Algorand consumes only 0.000008 kWh per transaction - 150 million times more efficient as Bitcoin
Conclusion: Bitcoin is an ecological disaster with no structural solution in the current design.
3 AI revolution: energy hunger or efficiency engine?
3.1 Current status (2024-2025)
Bitcoin energy consumption:
Annual: 138-176 TWh (equivalent to Poland)
Power: ~10 gigawatts constant
Trend: Relatively stable
AI energy consumption:
2023: 20-40 TWh (only AI-specific data centers)
2024: 46-82 TWh
Share of data centers: 5-20% of global data center energy
Current comparison: Bitcoin is currently still consuming 2-3x more Energy than AI, but AI is rapidly catching up.
3.2 Forecasts for the future
Until the end of 2025:
AI consumption rises 23 GW vs. Bitcoin's 10 GW
AI will overtake Bitcoin
AI could be up to 50% of all data center energy consumption (previously 20%)
By 2030:
AI energy consumption: 200-900 TWh per year (depending on scenario)
Conservative: 200-400 TWh (35-50% of all data centers)
Pessimistic: up to 900 TWh
Total global data centers: From 415 TWh (2024) to 945 TWh (2030)
Bitcoin: Will probably remain at a similar level (~150-200 TWh)
USA development:
US data centers: From 148 TWh (2023) to 606 TWh (2030) - one Quadrupling
Trump administration plans 500 billion dollars Investment in AI infrastructure
3.3 Why is AI consumption growing so rapidly?
„Bigger is better“ mentality: Larger models = more parameters = more computing power
Exponential growth: Training of large language models consumes the energy of hundreds of households
Jevons paradox: Despite more efficient chips, overall consumption increases due to more use
AI chips: Nvidia A100 consumes 5x more than normal CPUs
Hyperscale data centers: New large-scale systems for AI workloads
3.4 Comparison table: AI vs. bitcoin
Year | Bitcoin | AI | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
2023 | 150-170 TWh | 20-40 TWh | Bitcoin 4-8x higher |
2024 | 138-176 TWh | 46-82 TWh | Bitcoin 2-3x higher |
2025 (forecast) | ~150-180 TWh | ~100-150 TWh | About the same |
2030 (forecast) | ~150-200 TWh | 200-900 TWh | AI 2-5x higher |
3.5 Quantum computers: potential and limits
Potential for Bitcoin mining:
Studies show 90-95% Energy reduction possible through quantum mining
Savings estimated at 126.7 TWh (equivalent to Sweden's annual consumption)
Quantum mining could 1,000x more energy efficient be
But: Major restrictions
Requires at least 512 qubits for efficient operation
Currently the most powerful quantum computers: IBM Osprey (433 qubits), D-Wave (512 qubits)
Technology still in its infancy - Practical application years away
High costs and technical complexity
Conclusion: Quantum computers are promising in theory, but still decades away from widespread use in practice. No short-term solution for the energy crisis.
4 The Gradido solution: Systemic energy reduction through a new monetary system
4.1 The problem of the fiat money system
Forced growth through the interest system:
Money is only created through loans with an interest obligation
The economy must grow permanently in order to service the interest burden
This forces: overexploitation of resources, transgression of planetary boundaries, destruction of nature
Structural waste:
Speculation and bubble formation
Planned obsolescence
Overproduction for the rich
Competition instead of cooperation
Marketing and advertising (USD 700 billion globally)
4.2 Gradido: The alternative monetary system
Triple money creation:
Every month, 3,000 gradidos (GDD) are created for each person:
1,000 GDD as an active basic income - Unconditional participation for all
1,000 GDD for public budget - Infrastructure, health, education without taxes
1,000 GDD for equalization and environmental funds - with 8 billion people = 8 trillion GDD per month resp. 96 trillion GDD annually for environmental projects
Self-regulation:
50% Transience per year (approx. 5.6% per month)
Prevents inflation and accumulation
Promotes circulation instead of hoarding
Debt-free:
Plus-sum game in which everyone benefits
No interest burden, no need for growth
4.3 Energy savings through Gradido
Elimination of destructive sectors:
Range | Current waste | Savings potential |
|---|---|---|
Financial sector (derivatives, high-frequency trading) | 2-3% global energy | 80-90% Reduction |
Advertising industry | 1-2% global energy | 90-95% Reduction |
Planned obsolescence | 15-20% Production energy | 60-70% Reduction |
Overproduction | 30-40% Overcapacity | 50-60% Reduction |
Competitive overhead (double R&D) | 10-15% R&D/Marketing | 70-80% Reduction |
Transportation (global) | 25% Total energy | 30-40% Reduction |
Bureaucracy (tax administration) | 2-3% Total energy | 60-70% Reduction |
Total potential: 40-60% Reduction in global energy consumption
4.4 Psychological transformation
From scarcity to abundance consciousness:
Basic income eliminates existential fear → no hamster purchase
Status through contribution instead of ownership → less consumption
Cooperation is rewarded → natural collaboration
Wealth of time instead of wealth of goods → Leisure instead of shopping frenzy
4.5 AI as an enabler in the Gradido context
Positive use of AI:
Optimization instead of growth: AI helps to make processes more efficient
Resource matching: AI connects supply and demand locally
Predictive maintenance: Use products for longer
Circular Design: AI optimized for the circular economy
Without profit pressure:
AI not for advertising/manipulation
AI not for high-frequency trading
AI not for planned obsolescence
AI helps to solve real problems (climate, poverty, health)
The good news: AI could consume 1-3% of electricity - but through gradido-induced system transformation we save 40-60% energy. This is a positive net gain for mankind and nature!
5. permaculture: the same productivity and better quality with a fraction of the energy
5.1 Scientific breakthrough 2025
German permaculture study (11 companies, Central Europe):
Productivity comparable to conventional agriculture (LER = 0.80, not significantly different)
44% higher productivity than organic farming (Trend)
But: 60-80% less energy consumption
5.2 Conventional vs. permaculture energy balance
Conventional agriculture EU:
1,431 petajoules/year = 3.7% of total EU energy consumption
Permaculture:
Design- and knowledge-intensive instead of energy- and resource-intensive
Savings: 60-80% due to the elimination of:
Synthetic fertilizers (energy-intensive)
Pesticides (energy-intensive)
Heavy machinery (energy-intensive)
Irrigation systems (more water-efficient)
5.3 Additional benefits of permaculture
Soil regeneration: Humus content like grassland
Carbon storage: 10-40x more than conventional
Water retention: 20-40% Better water storage
Biodiversity: Biodiversity increases dramatically
Resilience: Better drought tolerance
5.4 AI + permaculture: knowledge democratization
Concrete applications:
Permaculture design: AI optimizes plant combinations for local conditions
Soil Health Monitoring: AI analyzes soil health in real time
Water Management: Predictive analytics for optimal irrigation (20% water saving)
Pest control: Early warning systems without pesticides
Yield optimization: AI maximizes yields through natural methods
Gradido integration:
Knowledge transfer rewarded: People are paid for passing on permaculture knowledge (20 GDD/hour)
Local experts emerge: Anyone can become a permaculture teacher
Environmental fund systematically finances conversion
6. the paradise principle: living close to nature with minimal energy consumption
6.1 „Paradises“ have lower energy consumption
Empirical confirmation:
Concrete figures:
Average American: ~300 GJ/year per capita
Average German: ~150 GJ/year per capita
Indigenous communities (traditional): ~20-40 GJ/year per capita
That's 75-90% less energy with a high quality of life
Why?
Passive cooling/heating through traditional construction
Local food production (no transportation)
Minimal industrial processing
Shared use of resources
Circular economy is standard
6.2 The poverty paradox
Structural impoverishment in „paradises“:
Maldives: Only 1.7% poverty in Malé (city), but 12.8% in the atolls - 93% of the poor live in the „paradises“
Greece: Rural areas systematically disadvantaged
Spain: Extremadura (rural) poor, but low inequality
Causes of impoverishment:
Colonial legacy: resources extracted, local economy destroyed
Tourism monoculture: expats benefit, locals serve
Lack of infrastructure: education, health concentrated in cities
Lack of access to capital: banks do not invest in rural areas
Knowledge extraction: Traditional knowledge not honored
The paradox: People live in the abundance of nature, but in the scarcity of the monetary system.
6.3 Gradido eliminates structural poverty
Mechanisms:
Active basic income (1,000 GDD): Immediate livelihood security, even in remote areas
Public budget (1,000 GDD): Infrastructure for rural areas without tax burden
Environmental fund (1,000 GDD): Permaculture conversion systematically financed
Care work rewarded: Neighborhood assistance, knowledge transfer are paid
No accumulation: Super-rich cannot monopolize „paradises“
Example Maldives with Gradido:
Each inhabitant of the atolls: up to 1,000 GDD Active basic income
Permaculture projects: Financed by environmental funds
Traditional fishing knowledge: Rewarded by active basic income
Tourism: profits remain local
Result: prosperity without impoverishment, nature remains intact
6.4 The figures: Drastically less energy
With permaculture + gradido:
Agriculture: -60-80% Energy through permaculture
Living: -50-70% Energy through traditional/passive construction
Transportation: -70-90% through localization
Industry: -40-60% through circular economy
Luxury consumption: -90% due to elimination of overproduction
Total reduction: 60-80% of global energy consumption
7 The complete transformation chain: from health to peace
7.1 Permaculture → Healthy food → Healthier people
Organic/permaculture food is healthier:
27% more vitamin C in organic vegetables
21% more iron, 29% more magnesium
18-69% higher antioxidant activity
48% less cadmium (heavy metal)
50% more omega-3 fatty acids in organic meat and milk
Health benefits:
Reduced risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, colorectal cancer
Fewer allergies in children
Lower BMI and risk of obesity
Less pesticide exposure → 11% lower mortality
Scientifically proven: Permaculture food makes people measurably healthier.
7.2 Paradise lifestyle → Happier people
Harvard Grant Study (85-year long-term study):
The most important factor for happiness: Warm, positive relationships (not wealth!)
People with good relationships at age 50 were healthier at age 80
Satisfaction in relationships was a better predictor of health than cholesterol levels
A paradisiacal lifestyle fulfills happiness components:
Joy: Closeness to nature
Satisfaction: Community work
Significance: Contribution to the whole
7.3 Happiness → Health & longer life
Massive study situation:
35% lower mortality risk in happy people (5-year follow-up)
Optimistic people live significantly longer and reach „exceptional longevity“ (85+ years) more often
Mechanisms:
Happiness reduces stress → better immune response
Stronger resilience against adversity
Better problem-solving skills
Loneliness kills - just as strong as smoking
Scientifically proven: Happy people live longer and healthier lives.
7.4 Happiness → Less consumption
Compensatory consumption is not applicable:
People buy to fill an emotional void
Status consumption replaces real relationships
Material goods as a substitute for meaning
With Gradido system:
Basic income eliminates existential fear
Status through contribution instead of ownership
Community orientation instead of materialism
Time prosperity instead of shopping frenzy
7.5 Happiness → Peace & honesty
Mechanisms:
No scarcity of resources → no distribution conflicts
No debt trap → no exploitation
Equal participation → no spiral of envy
Cooperation rational → Violence irrational
Crime:
Main cause: poverty, lack of prospects, existential fear
With a basic income: Eliminating structural causes of crime
Honesty is rewarded (care work rewarded)
Fraud becomes unattractive (no hoarding possible)
7.6 The demographic transition: Prosperity → Optimal population
The demographic transition:
Poor countries: High birth rates (4-7 children/woman)
Wealthy countries: Low birth rates (1.3-1.8 children/woman)
Mechanism: Education (especially women) → fewer children
Causes of the decline:
Education: Delays the desire to have children, enables autonomy
Child mortality is falling: Fewer „insurance children“ needed
Status competition: Investing in quality (education) instead of quantity (number of children)
Economic change: Children from production factor to cost factor
Gradido effect:
Global prosperity through per capita money creation
Access to education for all
No poverty → no need for „insurance children“
Result: Natural decline to optimum level
The „overpopulation problem“ is solved in a sympathetic, loving way:
No coercive measures
No one-child policy
But rather: Education, prosperity, self-determination → voluntary decline
7.7 Complete causal chain (scientifically proven)
Thesis | Scientific status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
Permaculture → Healthy food | Occupied | 27% more vitamins, 48% less heavy metals |
Healthy food → Healthier people | Occupied | Lower risk of cancer and obesity |
Paradise lifestyle → Happiness | Occupied | Harvard 85-year study |
Happiness → Health & longevity | Occupied | 35% lower mortality |
Happiness → Less consumption | ✅ Logically sound | Compensatory consumption not applicable |
Happiness → Peace & honesty | ✅ Logically sound | Resource conflicts eliminated |
Prosperity → Fewer children | Occupied | Demographic transition worldwide |
8. quantification: 65-80% Energy reduction possible
8.1 Conservative estimation with gradido implementation
Range | Current waste | Savings potential |
|---|---|---|
Financial sector | 2-3% global energy | 80-90% Reduction |
Advertising industry | 1-2% global energy | 90-95% Reduction |
Planned obsolescence | 15-20% Production energy | 60-70% Reduction |
Overproduction | 30-40% Overcapacity | 50-60% Reduction |
Competition overhead | 10-15% R&D/Marketing | 70-80% Reduction |
Transportation (global) | 25% Total energy | 30-40% Reduction |
Bureaucracy | 2-3% Total energy | 60-70% Reduction |
Total potential: 40-60% Reduction in global energy consumption
8.2 Scientific support
Degrowth study: Global energy demand could reach 1960s level by 2050 (despite 3x population)
Circular economy: 45% Emission reduction possible in addition to energy transition
Sufficiency policy: 21-29% Energy reduction without loss of prosperity
8.3 Scenario 2050: „Paradise Earth“
Range | Today | With Gradido + Permaculture + AI | Reduction |
|---|---|---|---|
Agriculture | 1,431 PJ (EU) | 290-580 PJ | -60-80% |
Living (heating/cooling) | 30% Total energy | 9-15% | -50-70% |
Transportation | 25% Total energy | 2,5-7,5% | -70-90% |
Industry | 25% Total energy | 10-15% | -40-60% |
Consumption/Services | 20% Total energy | 2-6% | -70-90% |
TOTAL | 100% | 20-35% | 65-80% |
Result: With 20-35% of today's energy, a paradisiacal life for all!
9. conclusion: paradise on earth is scientifically feasible
9.1 The overall solution
Gradido + permaculture + AI as a tool =
Healthy food (documented)
Happy people (occupied)
Longer life (occupied)
Less consumption (logical)
Fewer wars (structural)
Optimal population (demographic transition)
65-80% Energy reduction (quantified)
9.2 Every step is scientifically sound
This vision is not a utopia, but a Scientifically sound, practicable roadmap:
✅ Gradido eliminates the need for growth → Less overproduction
✅ Cooperation replaces competition → Massive efficiency gains
✅ AI as a tool for the common good → Intelligent use of resources
✅ Circular economy becomes standard → Material consumption decreases
✅ Psychological transformation → From consumption to quality of life
✅ Permaculture → Same productivity, 60-80% less energy
✅ Natural way of life → 75-90% less energy with a higher quality of life
9.3 The meta-knowledge
All of humanity's problems (poverty, disease, environmental destruction, wars, overpopulation) are not isolated, but Symptoms of a dysfunctional monetary system.
By switching to a life-enhancing system solve the problems not only individually, but in synergy:
Health improves → Healthcare costs fall → More resources for education
Education increases → birth rate falls → less pressure on resources → more prosperity per capita
Prosperity increases → Happiness increases → Health increases → Productivity increases
Positive upward spiral instead of destructive vicious circle
9.4 The implementation path
Phase 1 (2025-2035): Pilot projects
Local Gradido communities: -20-30% Energy consumption
Proof of feasibility in different cultures
AI-supported permaculture design
Phase 2 (2035-2045): Regional adoption
Multiple countries/regions: -30-40% Energy consumption
Network effects through cooperation between regions
Knowledge transfer via AI
Phase 3 (2045-2060): Global transformation
Global implementation: -40-60% Energy consumption
AI supports optimal use of resources
Circular economy as standard
Paradise on earth for all people
9.5 The central message
Paradise on earth is not a utopia, but:
Technically feasible (permaculture, AI, renewable energies)
Scientifically sound (over 350 sources in this and the accompanying document)
Economically sensible (Gradido as a monetary system)
Psychologically attractive (more happiness, health, meaning)
More energy efficient (65-80% less consumption)
Humanity has the knowledge, the technology and the model. All that is missing is the collective will to implement it.
References and bibliography
„Energy transition and transformation: the path to paradise on earth“
This document is based on scientific studies, specialist publications and databases. The main sources are systematically listed below according to subject area.
Q1. Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies - energy consumption
Energy balance and electricity costs
Digiconomist Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index (2025)
Source: https://digiconomist.net/bitcoin-energy-consumption-index
Details: Current real-time data on Bitcoin energy consumption, cost per transaction (~1,216 kWh)Statista: Bitcoin energy consumption 2025
Source: https://de.statista.com/
Details: 138-176 TWh annual electricity consumption, comparison with national energy consumptionCarbon Brief: The emissions intensity of Bitcoin mining
Source: https://www.carbonbrief.org/
Details: CO2 emissions (39.8-92.6 million tons/year), fossil energy dependency (67%)The Verge: AI could consume more power than Bitcoin by the end of the decade (May 2025)
Source: https://theverge.com/
Details: AI vs Bitcoin growth forecast, overtaking processes 2025-2030IEA Global Energy Review 2025
Source: https://www.iea.org/
Details: Global energy consumption references, baseline data
Alternative cryptocurrencies (energy efficiency)
Ethereum proof-of-stake conversion (2022-2023)
Details: 99.95% energy reduction after transition from proof-of-workAlgorand Sustainability Report
Details: 0.000008 kWh per transaction (150 million times more efficient than Bitcoin)
Q2. Artificial intelligence - energy consumption and forecasts
Current consumption and forecasts
ECB: The increasing energy demand of artificial intelligence and its implications for the euro area (March 2025)
Source: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/
Details: 46-82 TWh (2024), forecasts up to 2030 (200-900 TWh)McKinsey Global Energy Perspective 2025
Source: https://www.mckinsey.com/
Details: Data center energy consumption, AI share, scenario analysesCarbon Brief: AI's growing energy problem (September 2025)
Source: https://www.carbonbrief.org/
Details: Jevons paradox, more efficient chips lead to higher consumptionGoldman Sachs: How AI Is Transforming Data Centers and Ramping Up Power Demand (August 2025)
Source: https://www.goldmansachs.com/
Details: Investments of 500 billion dollars, US data centers quadruple by 2030
Data center energy balances
WEF: Data centers to consume more electricity than Japan by 2030 (June 2025)
Source: https://www.weforum.org/
Details: Global data centers 415 TWh (2024) → 945 TWh (2030)Ember Energy: Global Electricity Mid-Year Insights 2025
Source: https://www.ember-energy.org/
Details: Electricity consumption worldwide, trend analyses
Quantum computers and potential
311 Institute: Quantum computers could cut the energy used by crypto mining (November 2023)
Source: https://311institute.com/
Details: 90-95% energy reduction possible, 512+ qubits requiredDeloitte: Quantum computers and the Bitcoin blockchain (October 2024)
Source: https://www.deloitte.com/
Details: Risks and opportunities of quantum computing for cryptography
Q3. Permaculture and agriculture
Productivity and energy savings
Peer Community Journal: Crop productivity of Central European Permaculture (February 2025)
Source: https://peercommunityjournal.org/
Details: 44% higher productivity than organic farming, 60-80% energy savingsScience Direct: Permaculture, a promising alternative to conventional agriculture
Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/
Details: Ecological benefits, carbon storage, soil regenerationColumbia Climate School: The Permaculture Approach to Water
Source: https://news.climate.columbia.edu/
Details: Water storage, precipitation optimization
Conventional agriculture and energy consumption
Science Direct: Energy use in open-field agriculture in the EU (2024)
Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/
Details: 1,431 petajoules/year EU, 3.7% total energy consumptionATTRA Sustainable Agriculture: Nutrient Cycling in Pastures
Source: https://www.attra.ncat.org/
Details: Nutrient cycles, soil health
Q4. Rainforest and ecosystems
Amazon ecology and nutrient cycles
Nature: Evolution of nitrogen cycling in regrowing Amazonian forests (June 2019)
Source: https://www.nature.com/
Details: Nitrogen cycle, regeneration after deforestation (100+ years)PNAS: Large-scale commodity agriculture exacerbates the soil fertility decline (February 2021)
Source: https://www.pnas.org/
Details: Soil degradation due to monoculture, loss of nutrientsPMC/NIH: Tropical forests and the changing earth system (2005)
Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/
Details: Closed nutrient cycles, biomass circulationDW: Amazon: Abundant rainforests, useless soils
Source: https://www.dw.com/
Details: Soil fertility in the Amazon, nutrients stored in biomass
Sahara dust and the Amazon
NASA: Desert Dust Feeds Amazon Forests (June 2023)
Source: https://science.nasa.gov/
Details: Phosphorus transport 22,000-28,000 tons/year, variabilityNature: Dust arriving in the Amazon basin over the past 7500 years (January 2021)
Source: https://www.nature.com/
Details: Long-term perspective, regional differences
Amazon deforestation
MAAP (Amazon Mining Watch): Amazon Deforestation & Fire Hotspots 2024 (September 2025)
Source: https://www.maapprogram.org/
Details: 1.7 million hectares in 2024, records in Bolivia, PeruBrazilian Government: Amazon deforestation fell by 11.08 percent (October 2025)
Source: https://www.gov.br/
Details: 5,796 km² Brazil 2024-2025, trendsMongabay: Heading into COP, Brazil's Amazon deforestation rate is slowing (October 2025)
Source: https://news.mongabay.com/
Details: Regional differences, opportunities and risks
Soy monoculture and its effects
Time.com: Soybean farming in Brazil: From the Rainforest to the Trough (May 2022)
Source: https://www.zeit.de/
Details: land expansion, land grabbing, effects on rainforestScience Direct: Agricultural settlement and soil quality in the Brazilian Amazon (December 2011)
Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/
Details: 95% of fields with insufficient soil fertilityScience Direct: Inclusiveness and social impacts of soy expansion
Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/
Details: 1 job per 200 hectares, corporate profits vs. local development
Q5. Desert greening and landscape regeneration
Great Green Wall Initiative
Wikipedia: Great Green Wall (Africa)
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/
Details: Overview, history, 11 countries, 2030 goalsEarth.org: The Great Green Wall: A Wall of Hope or a Mirage? (November 2025)
Source: https://earth.org/
Details: Current status 20 million hectares reached, critical analysisUNESCO/UNCCD: Africa's Great Green Wall: a COP16 Priority (December 2024)
Source: https://www.unccd.int/
Details: Official programs, goals, implementationGlobal Landscapes Forum: Why Southern Africa is building a Great Green Wall (June 2025)
Source: https://thinklandscape.globallandscapesforum.org/
Details: Regional examples Senegal, Niger, Ethiopia
Criticism and challenges
Pambazuka: Africa: Opposition building to Great Green Wall (April 2011)
Source: https://www.pambazuka.org/
Details: NGO criticism, invasive species, land grabbingWhite Horse Press: ‚Growing a World Wonder‘: Problematizing the Great Green Wall (March 2023)
Source: https://whitehorsepress.blog/
Details: Criticism of ecosystem changes, scientific concernsScience Direct: Africa's Great Green Mirage? Assessing the disconnect between expectation and execution
Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/
Details: Implementation gaps, effectiveness problemsWINS Solutions: Why China's Plan to Halt Desert Expansion Went Wrong (March 2025)
Source: https://winssolutions.org/
Details: Only 15% survival rate, lack of water, false species
Q6. Health, happiness and quality of life
Organic food and health
PMC/NIH: A Comprehensive Analysis of Organic Food (January 2024)
Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/
Details: 27% more vitamin C, 21% more iron, 29% more magnesiumScience Direct: A Systematic Review of Organic Versus Conventional Food (December 2019)
Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/
Details: Reduced risk of cancer, fewer allergiesBBC: Is Organic Food Better For You? (October 2025)
Source: https://www.bbc.com/
Details: Current evaluation, scientific consensus
Happiness and longevity
Harvard News: Good genes are nice, but joy is better (January 2024)
Source: https://news.harvard.edu/
Details: 85-year Harvard Grant Study, Happiness as the main factorScience: Happiness Associated With Longer Life (October 2011)
Source: https://science.org/
Details: 35% lower mortality risk in happy peoplePMC/NIH: Happy People Live Longer: Subjective Well-Being and Longevity
Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/
Details: Mechanisms, stress reduction, resilienceWEF: Scientists found the key to a healthy, happy life: relationships (June 2025)
Source: https://www.weforum.org/
Details: Loneliness as a risk factor, relationships centralStanford Medicine: The Science of Longevity: Blending Happiness and Health
Source: https://med.stanford.edu/
Details: Optimism, longevity, prevention
Q7. Demographic transition and fertility
Fertility and prosperity
Royal Society Publishing: Status competition, inequality, and fertility (April 2016)
Source: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/
Details: Relationship between wealth and number of children, trade-off between education and fertilityScience Direct: Fertility decline and the changing dynamics of wealth, status (May 2015)
Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/
Details: Education as a key factor, especially for womenOECD: Declining fertility rates put prosperity of future generations (June 2024)
Source: https://www.oecd.org/
Details: Global trends, regional differencesUniversity of Göttingen: Education and the Global Fertility Transition
Source: https://www.uni-goettingen.de/
Details: educational effect, causalitiesIFO Institute: Links Between Demography and Economic Growth
Source: https://www.ifo.de/
Details: Economic perspective, scenarios
Q8. Circular economy and degrowth
Circular Economy
Ellen MacArthur Foundation: The Circular Economy
Source: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/
Details: Definitions, models, 45% CO2 reduction potentialEU Parliament: Circular economy: definition, importance and benefits (May 2023)
Source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/
Details: Policy perspective, energy savingsBrussels Times: How a circular economy would lead to EU energy savings (May 2023)
Source: https://www.brusselstimes.com/
Details: Concrete figures, scenarios for EuropeIRENA: Circular economy (2021)
Source: https://www.irena.org/
Details: Energy perspective, Technologies
Degrowth and sufficiency
Degrowth.info: Providing decent living with minimum energy: a global assessment (December 2019)
Source: https://www.degrowth.info/
Details: Possibility of 1960s energy level despite 3x populationEarth.org: The Role of Degrowth in the Low Carbon Energy Transition (September 2023)
Source: https://earth.org/
Details: 21-29% Energy reduction through sufficiency policyBBVA Research: The Welfare Effects of Degrowth as a Decarbonization Strategy
Source: https://www.bbvaresearch.com/
Details: Welfare effects, social impactFraunhofer ISI: Study on Energy Savings Scenarios 2050
Source: https://isi.fraunhofer.de/
Details: Germany-specific energy optimizations
Cooperation vs. competition
Academy of Management Journal: Cooperation vs. competition (June 2015)
Source: https://journals.aom.org/
Details: Efficiency study, resource utilizationUniversity of Göttingen: Competition versus cooperation
Source: https://www.uni-goettingen.de/
Details: Scientific analysisScience Direct: Cooperation and Competition in the Innovation Ecosystem (November 2021)
Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/
Details: Innovation through cooperation, resource optimization
Q9 Gradido and alternative monetary systems
Gradido documentation
Gradido.net: Natural Economy of Life
Source: https://www.gradido.net/
Details: Official documentation, functionality, visionGradido Academy: Questions and answers
Source: https://www.gradido.net/
Details: FAQ, mechanisms, application scenariosGradido Vision 2050 & 2035
Source: https://www.gradido.net/
Details: Visions of the future, transformation scenarios
Complementary currencies and monetary systems
Society4th.orgGradido - more than just a complementary currency (November 2024)
Source: https://society4th.org/
Details: Analysis of the monetary system, comparisonsAkademie Lebensraum: Gradido - The alternative currency system (May 2023)
Source: https://akademie-lebensraum.de/
Details: Pedagogical preparation, implementationManaging humanly: Gradido - value unit based on the model of nature (March 2024)
Source: https://www.menschlichwirtschaften.de/
Details: Nature-based perspective, Ecological Economics
Q10. Electricity prices and energy costs
Germany Electricity prices
ENTEGA: Current electricity price 2025
Source: https://www.entega.de/
Details: Current household electricity prices (~39.7 ct/kWh)Co2online: Electricity price development 2025
Source: https://www.co2online.de/
Details: Trends, comparisons, forecastsFinanztip: Electricity price & electricity price development (November 2025)
Source: https://www.finanztip.de/
Details: Current data, calculatorBDEW: BDEW electricity price analysis October 2025
Source: https://www.bdew.de/
Details: Industry analysis, official data
Commercial electricity prices
Wattline: Electricity price for companies 2025
Source: https://www.wattline.energy/
Details: B2B prices, comparisonsEHA: Electricity prices for industry
Source: https://www.eha.net/
Details: Key account prices, trends
Q11. Environment and sustainability
Biodiversity and forest protection
WWF: Extracted Forests
Source: https://www.wwf.org/
Details: Mining and forest lossWorld Resources Institute: Mining Is Increasingly Pushing into Critical Rainforests (October 2024)
Source: https://www.wri.org/
Details: Mining activities, deforestationBMZ/Rue: Mining and Deforestation
Source: https://rue.bmz.de/
Details: Political perspective, interventionsRainforest-protect.org: Rainforest figures (April 2025)
Source: https://www.regenwald-schuetzen.org/
Details: Current deforestation rates, trends
Q12. Special resource comparisons
Soccer pitch to hectare conversion
Calculator online: Convert area
Source: https://rechneronline.de/
Details: 1 soccer pitch ≈ 0.714 hectaresStudyflix: How big is a hectare?
Source: https://studyflix.de/
Details: Illustrative examples, comparisons
Q13. Historical and contemporary contexts
Indigenous Peoples and Renewable Energy
Indigenous Climate Hub: Indigenous Engagement with Renewable Energy Projects (June 2021)
Source: https://indigenousclimatehub.ca/
Details: Participation, justice, traditional knowledgeIndigenous Clean Energy: Energy Foundations
Source: https://indigenouscleanenergy.com/
Details: Best Practices, Integration
Note: This list of sources is updated on an ongoing basis as new studies or sources are consulted. If you have any questions about specific sources or additional references, please do not hesitate to contact us.