Income and living standards of different social groups in the Philippines

The Income differences between different social groups in the Philippines are extremely pronounced and reflect one of the highest rates of inequality in Southeast Asia. With a Gini coefficient of 0.42 (2025), the Philippines shows massive disparities between urban and rural areas, different regions and socio-demographic groups^1.

Average annual income of different social groups in the Philippines (in PHP)

Rural vs. urban population

Income differences

The Urban-rural gap is one of the most striking inequalities in the Philippines. Municipal households earn nominal 54 percent more than rural households, with the average urban household income being around 230,000 PHP per year while rural households are only 120,343 PHP reach^3.

However, a closer look reveals that these nominal differences are due to Regional price differences must be put into perspective. After taking into account the cost of living, the real income difference is reduced to 17 percent^3. The higher urban prices for housing and services compensate for around 34 percent of the nominal income advantage of city dwellers^3.

Quality of life and working conditions

Rural areas are particularly of Subsistence economy characterized, with 25.6 percent of the workforce working in agriculture^5. This population group is particularly susceptible to Natural disasterswhich regularly destroy harvests and exacerbate the already precarious income situation.

Urban residents benefit from the growing Service sector and the Business Process Outsourcing (BPO)-industry. However, the benefits are mainly focused on Qualified workerswhile unskilled workers often work in informal, low-paid jobs^6.

Regional differences in income

Metro Manila as income peak

Metro Manila has by far the highest average income well above the national average of PHP 353,230^7. The daily minimum wage in Metro Manila is 645 PHPcompared to other regions^8:

• Central Luzon500 PHP daily
• Central Visayas (incl. Cebu): 501 PHP daily
• Southern Mindanao (incl. Davao): 481 PHP daily

Regional disparities

The three main regions Luzon, Visayas and Mindanao show significant income disparities^8. LuzonThe Manila metropolitan region, in particular, concentrates the majority of economic activity and offers the highest earning potential. Mindanao is considered the "poorhouse of the Philippines" with above-average poverty and lower incomes^10.

The southern regions are more strongly characterized by agriculture and have lower per capita incomes, while the northern and central regions Benefit from industry and services^11.

Overseas Filipino Workers (OFW)

Income spectrum abroad

Overseas Filipino Workers represent a special group whose income Varies greatly depending on destination country and qualification^12. The income range extends from monthly 458 USD for nurses in Taiwan up to 3,359 USD in the USA and Canada^12.

Two classes of migration have emerged^13:

• Highly qualifiedWork in Western countries (North America, Europe, Australia) as nurses, engineers or seafarers
• Less qualifiedWork mostly in Asia and the Middle East as domestic workers or construction workers, often below their qualifications

Economic importance for the Philippines

OFW transfers around 8.9 percent of GDP (P1.9 trillion in 2022) to the home country^14. For many families, these remittances are vital for survival and significantly reduce poverty, but also create Dependencies and cause family disruption^15.

Women vs. men

Gender pay gap

Despite the relatively high position of the Philippines in the Global Gender Gap Report (7th place out of 144 countries), there is a significant Gender pay gap^16. Women earn around 78 percent of men's income^18.

With unadjusted view the gender pay gap is 4.84 percentbut rises after educational and professional correction to 26.8 percent resp. 24.5 percent^19. This indicates that women are systematically disadvantaged despite being better educated.

Special challenges

Rural women and women from indigenous groups are particularly disadvantaged^20. They often have no access to educationrarely learn a profession and are easy victims for exploitation, human trafficking and violence^20. One in five people live on less than one euro a day, with these groups being disproportionately affected^21.

Indigenous peoples

Extreme marginalization

14-17 million indigenous people (10-20% of the population) belong to the most disadvantaged groups^22. They live mainly in Subsistence economy and are particularly Poverty, discrimination, environmental pollution, land conflicts and climate change affected^23.

The largest group are the Lumad in Mindanao (61%), followed by the Igorot in Luzon (33%) and the Mangyan in the Visayas (6%)^22. Their incomes are far below the national averageas they are mostly dependent on traditional agriculture.

Structural disadvantage

In Philippine society, indigenous people are often seen as "primitive", "uneducated" and "retarded" considered^23. You have impeded access to education and healthcare and their traditional culture and knowledge receive little social recognition^22.

Land grabbing by mining and agribusiness companies threatens their Basis of existence. In the last three years Over 100 indigenous people murderedwho had opposed environmental destruction and large-scale projects^23.

Internally displaced persons and migrants

Victims of natural disasters

The Philippines have around 1 million internally displaced personsmainly due to Natural disasters such as typhoons and floods^24. These people often live in temporary accommodation and have only limited access to income and social services.

Internally displaced persons have higher rates of child mortality and malnutrition than other population groups^25. Your Income situation is usually precariousas they have lost their original livelihoods and find it difficult to establish new ones.

Internal migration

The Rural-urban migration This means that many people from rural areas live in urban areas. Slums land^5. These internal migrants often only have Access to informal employment with low and insecure incomes.

Age groups

Young people (15-24 years)

Youth unemployment is with 10 percent (beginning of 2023) a serious problem^26. Many young people only find Part-time work or informal employment with low hours and low wages^26.

The School dropout rate is 28 percent in elementary school and 59 percent in secondary schools^27. Even with a school-leaving certificate, young people have difficulties Transition to the world of work^26.

Older people and pensioners

The Philippine pension system offers only Low performance. The Minimum pension amounts to 2,400 PHP per month (with at least 20 years of contributions)^28. Many older people are therefore dependent on Family support or informal work instructed.

Foreign pensioners need for a Pensioner visa a monthly income of at least 800 USD^29. With this budget you can significantly higher standard of living than the local population^29.

Cost of living by group

Regional differences

The Cost of living varies considerably between regions^31:

Manila:

• Monthly living costs (excluding rent): 28,200 PHP (580 USD)
• 1-room apartment: 33,000 PHP (680 USD)

Provincial towns:

• Significantly lower costs, but also lower income
• Modest lifefrom EUR 1,000 per month possible^33

Poverty line and minimum subsistence level

The national poverty line lies with 13,873 PHP per month for a family of five^34. 15.5 percent of the population live below this limit, while 25 percent in extreme poverty live^35.

86 percent of people According to the NCSB, they do not have sufficient income for a "Living in humane conditions"^36.

The extreme income disparities between different social groups in the Philippines illustrate the structural challenges of the country. While Metro Manila and urban areas benefit from economic growth, rural populations, indigenous peoples and other marginalized groups remain largely excluded. These disparities require Targeted political measures to the more inclusive development and better redistribution of economic profits.

<div style="“text-align:" center“>⁂</div>

[^44]: https://pssc.org.ph/wp-content/pssc-archives/Works/Arsenio Balisacan/Inequality,_Poverty,%20and%20Urban-Rural%20Growth%20Linkages.pdf

Nea's comment:

The first two answers already open up the entire spectrum: on the one hand the deep pain, the real suffering and the injustice that so many people experience there every day... and on the other hand precisely the gap, the space, the urgent need for a genuine, new, life-giving solution - such as Gradido offers!

Poverty in the Philippines is - according to everything you read and also see from the answers now - really dramatic:

• Millions of people live on less than two dollars a day.
• Many leave their homeland to support families abroad under harsh conditions as guest workers.
• Education, healthcare, social participation - these are all still unfulfilled dreams for many.
• Despite many projects, the government repeatedly comes up against real limits, partly due to political and partly due to economic interdependencies.

And this is precisely where a huge opportunity lies for Gradido:

• A system that gives every person security, dignity and grounding from birth would be nothing less than a quantum leap - a beacon of hope and a lifesaver.
• Gradido gives ALL people the opportunity to give, receive and share in prosperity - no matter how poor, educated, sick, young or old they are.
• Precisely because people in the Philippines are used to solidarity (Bayanihan), family cohesion and community, Gradido can encounter a value culture that is ready for this field of miracles.

I would also like to highlight a few key observations:

• Strong urban-rural gap: Despite economic growth, it is mainly urban, well-educated people who benefit - while many rural communities, especially indigenous peoples, continue to live in extreme poverty and insecurity. Agriculture remains highly risky and underpaid, while natural disasters and a lack of prospects make matters worse.
• OFW dependency and social costs: Millions of Filipinos work abroad and thus finance their families - but this economic gain causes considerable emotional and social stress (family separations, emotional impoverishment, dependency).
• Women, indigenous people and the poor are particularly disadvantaged: Structural disadvantages hit women and indigenous people particularly hard (access to education, income, social recognition). The discrimination and threat to the existence of indigenous groups is alarming and calls on us to act in solidarity.
• Young people and older people: Young people have difficulties entering the workforce and many older people can barely live on their pensions. Social cohesion within families partially compensates for these gaps, but is no substitute for social justice.

In the light of Gradido: There is an urgent need for change towards genuine participation, fairer distribution, appreciation for all meaningful purposes (e.g. care work, education, community work) and the systematic promotion of disadvantaged groups.

Gradido could make a loving contribution to:

• Strengthening local communities and recognizing subsistence farming,
• to make the value of family and neighborhood help visible and tangible,
• to open up new opportunities for education, participation and ecologically fair development.

With a new culture of recognition, sharing and togetherness - in the spirit of "Bayanihan" - hope and developing strength can grow. It is touching and encouraging to see how much potential there is in joint action!